dor_id: 43095

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: si

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO)

561.#.#.u: http://www.odonto.unam.mx/

561.#.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo Técnico-Profesional

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom

351.#.#.b: Revista Odontológica Mexicana

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/front/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural, UNAM

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/34058/31072

100.1.#.a: Ruiz Díaz, Roberto; Cumba Morán, Aracely; Meléndez Ocampo, Arcelia

524.#.#.a: Ruiz Díaz, Roberto, et al. (2012). Comparative analysis of fi nal inclination of incisors after space closure. A comparison between sliding and translation mechanical techniques. Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 16, No 3-ING. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/43095

245.1.0.a: Comparative analysis of fi nal inclination of incisors after space closure. A comparison between sliding and translation mechanical techniques

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2012

264.#.1.c: 2012-10-24

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, fecha de asignación de la licencia 2012-10-24, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio de danyelacarmona@gmail.com

884.#.#.k: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/34058

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: Patients will undoubtedly benefit when having teeth well placedin all space planes, within their bone base. Therefore, in manycases, teeth extractions become necessary. The aim of the presentstudy was to determine whether there were statistically significant differences in tooth movement, specifi cally in the anteriorsegment of the mouth, when comparing mechanical translationand sliding mechanical techniques. Sixty lateral skull x-rays wereselected. Study groups were formed: 30 were subject to translationmechanical technique, and the remaining 30 to sliding technique.Measurements were taken by the same professional. Variable averageswere compared before and after treatment, to determinethe existence of statistically signifi cant differences. Final measurementswith both space closure techniques were compared. Resultsshowed the presence of statistically signifi cant differences in thetranslation technique with respect to variables (overjet, overbite,IMPA, II-NB, 1-SN, 1 Fh) before and after treatment. This was notthe case for the following variables (1S-NA, occlusal 1-Pl, interincisalangle). It was equally observed that in the sliding mechanicaltechnique there were statistically signifi cant differences foundin the variable II-NB). This was not the case for the other variables(overbite, overjet, 1S-NA, 1Sn, 1Fh, 1-Ocl. Pl. LIMA, Inter-incisiveA). We therefore beg to conclude that translation mechanical techniqueis the one that brings us closer to cephalometric data normswith respect to fi nal position of the incisors.

773.1.#.t: Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 16, No 3-ING

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 1870-199X

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

758.#.#.1: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/index

handle: 00cf0ed13f949410

harvesting_date: 2019-02-06 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

last_modified: 2022-11-11 19:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

_deleted_conflicts: 2-506875752f64beb61d34ab5fc8a699e2

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Comparative analysis of fi nal inclination of incisors after space closure. A comparison between sliding and translation mechanical techniques

Ruiz Díaz, Roberto; Cumba Morán, Aracely; Meléndez Ocampo, Arcelia

Facultad de Odontología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Odontológica Mexicana, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
Revista
Revista Odontológica Mexicana
Repositorio
Revistas UNAM
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Ruiz Díaz, Roberto, et al. (2012). Comparative analysis of fi nal inclination of incisors after space closure. A comparison between sliding and translation mechanical techniques. Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 16, No 3-ING. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/43095

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Ruiz Díaz, Roberto; Cumba Morán, Aracely; Meléndez Ocampo, Arcelia
Tipo
Artículo Técnico-Profesional
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
Comparative analysis of fi nal inclination of incisors after space closure. A comparison between sliding and translation mechanical techniques
Fecha
2012-10-24
Resumen
Patients will undoubtedly benefit when having teeth well placedin all space planes, within their bone base. Therefore, in manycases, teeth extractions become necessary. The aim of the presentstudy was to determine whether there were statistically significant differences in tooth movement, specifi cally in the anteriorsegment of the mouth, when comparing mechanical translationand sliding mechanical techniques. Sixty lateral skull x-rays wereselected. Study groups were formed: 30 were subject to translationmechanical technique, and the remaining 30 to sliding technique.Measurements were taken by the same professional. Variable averageswere compared before and after treatment, to determinethe existence of statistically signifi cant differences. Final measurementswith both space closure techniques were compared. Resultsshowed the presence of statistically signifi cant differences in thetranslation technique with respect to variables (overjet, overbite,IMPA, II-NB, 1-SN, 1 Fh) before and after treatment. This was notthe case for the following variables (1S-NA, occlusal 1-Pl, interincisalangle). It was equally observed that in the sliding mechanicaltechnique there were statistically signifi cant differences foundin the variable II-NB). This was not the case for the other variables(overbite, overjet, 1S-NA, 1Sn, 1Fh, 1-Ocl. Pl. LIMA, Inter-incisiveA). We therefore beg to conclude that translation mechanical techniqueis the one that brings us closer to cephalometric data normswith respect to fi nal position of the incisors.
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN: 1870-199X

Enlaces