dor_id: 43082

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: si

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO)

561.#.#.u: http://www.odonto.unam.mx/

561.#.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo Técnico-Profesional

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom

351.#.#.b: Revista Odontológica Mexicana

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/front/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural, UNAM

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/30919/28651

100.1.#.a: Ríos Szalay, Enrique; Olivares Tapia, Selene; Treviño Santos, Alejandro; Mendoza Rivera, Susana

524.#.#.a: Ríos Szalay, Enrique, et al. (2012). Multi-disciplinary Prosthetic Rehabilitation. Clinical Case Report. Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 16, No 2-ING. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/43082

245.1.0.a: Multi-disciplinary Prosthetic Rehabilitation. Clinical Case Report

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2012

264.#.1.c: 2012-03-28

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, fecha de asignación de la licencia 2012-03-28, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio de danyelacarmona@gmail.com

884.#.#.k: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/30919

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: In present days, evolution in Dentistry and changes in prosthetic techniques and materials have rendered patients more demanding in matters concerning aesthetics, function, and comfort.  Issues involving face and teeth require interaction of several dental disciplines, with the aim of attaining prevention, function and aesthetics, which can be attained through well organized communication. Multidisciplinary prosthetic rehabilitation meets that goal. A multidisciplinary treatment is based upon diagnosis, planning and therapeutic procedures1,2. Treatment planning can initiate with a visualization of the final result. If several disciplines were not to be  involved in the comprehensive treatment, results could result compromised3. Objective Step by step description of clinical phases, in a multidisciplinary treatment based upon diagnosis and planning. Different specialties are involved: Surgery, Implantology, Periodontics, Endodontics, Oral Prosthesis and Occlusion. The inclusion of all these disciplines will achieve stability in the periodontal tissues as well as tissues surrounding future  implants, recovery of periodontal architecture and masticatory function, as well as attaining acceptable aesthetic results and gaining the patients aesthetic and functional satisfaction. Clinical Case Presentation 47 year old female patient, in general good health, some missing teeth, inappropriate  prosthetic work, loss of periodontal support as well as aesthetic and functional alterations. Treatment plan was decided upon, and divided into four phases: the first phase consisted on tooth extraction and implant placement. The second phase  involved canal treatment and re-treatment with stump reconstruction, which involved  the making of a guide for partial coronary conformation. The third prosthetic phase involved treatment of soft tissues, impressions, implant rehabilitation, characterization, cementing with the CAD-CAM Procera® system and occlusal splint. The fourth phase involved periodontal and prosthetic control. Conclusion Treatment success was based upon the following factors: 1) Maintenance  of  periodontal and  tissues surrounding the implant, 2) Periodontal architecture recovery, 3) Masticatory function recovery, 4) Obtaining acceptable aesthetic results, 5) Patient `s satisfaction with respect to aesthetics and function.

773.1.#.t: Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 16, No 2-ING

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 1870-199X

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

758.#.#.1: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/index

handle: 30403c4e278dc0c7

harvesting_date: 2019-02-06 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

last_modified: 2022-11-11 19:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

_deleted_conflicts: 2-9f68f034ecd421a83a41800a349d1a42

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Multi-disciplinary Prosthetic Rehabilitation. Clinical Case Report

Ríos Szalay, Enrique; Olivares Tapia, Selene; Treviño Santos, Alejandro; Mendoza Rivera, Susana

Facultad de Odontología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Odontológica Mexicana, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Ríos Szalay, Enrique, et al. (2012). Multi-disciplinary Prosthetic Rehabilitation. Clinical Case Report. Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 16, No 2-ING. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/43082

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Ríos Szalay, Enrique; Olivares Tapia, Selene; Treviño Santos, Alejandro; Mendoza Rivera, Susana
Tipo
Artículo Técnico-Profesional
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
Multi-disciplinary Prosthetic Rehabilitation. Clinical Case Report
Fecha
2012-03-28
Resumen
In present days, evolution in Dentistry and changes in prosthetic techniques and materials have rendered patients more demanding in matters concerning aesthetics, function, and comfort.  Issues involving face and teeth require interaction of several dental disciplines, with the aim of attaining prevention, function and aesthetics, which can be attained through well organized communication. Multidisciplinary prosthetic rehabilitation meets that goal. A multidisciplinary treatment is based upon diagnosis, planning and therapeutic procedures1,2. Treatment planning can initiate with a visualization of the final result. If several disciplines were not to be  involved in the comprehensive treatment, results could result compromised3. Objective Step by step description of clinical phases, in a multidisciplinary treatment based upon diagnosis and planning. Different specialties are involved: Surgery, Implantology, Periodontics, Endodontics, Oral Prosthesis and Occlusion. The inclusion of all these disciplines will achieve stability in the periodontal tissues as well as tissues surrounding future  implants, recovery of periodontal architecture and masticatory function, as well as attaining acceptable aesthetic results and gaining the patients aesthetic and functional satisfaction. Clinical Case Presentation 47 year old female patient, in general good health, some missing teeth, inappropriate  prosthetic work, loss of periodontal support as well as aesthetic and functional alterations. Treatment plan was decided upon, and divided into four phases: the first phase consisted on tooth extraction and implant placement. The second phase  involved canal treatment and re-treatment with stump reconstruction, which involved  the making of a guide for partial coronary conformation. The third prosthetic phase involved treatment of soft tissues, impressions, implant rehabilitation, characterization, cementing with the CAD-CAM Procera® system and occlusal splint. The fourth phase involved periodontal and prosthetic control. Conclusion Treatment success was based upon the following factors: 1) Maintenance  of  periodontal and  tissues surrounding the implant, 2) Periodontal architecture recovery, 3) Masticatory function recovery, 4) Obtaining acceptable aesthetic results, 5) Patient `s satisfaction with respect to aesthetics and function.
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN: 1870-199X

Enlaces