dor_id: 15671

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los textos propuestos para publicación en Estudios de Cultura Maya son arbitrados por el sistema de doble ciego

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); SCOPUS, Web Of Science (Wos); DOAJ, Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal (RedALyC)

561.#.#.u: http://www.iifilologicas.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Artes y Humanidades

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://revistas-filologicas.unam.mx/estudios-cultura-maya/index.php/ecm/index

351.#.#.b: Estudios de Cultura Maya

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://revistas-filologicas.unam.mx/estudios-cultura-maya/index.php/ecm/article/view/526/521

100.1.#.a: Edmonson, Munro S.

524.#.#.a: Edmonson, Munro S. (1979). Some Postclassic Questions About the Classic Maya. Estudios de Cultura Maya; Vol. 12, 1979. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/15671

245.1.0.a: Some Postclassic Questions About the Classic Maya

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 1979

264.#.1.c: 2013-02-15

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico estudios@unam.mx

884.#.#.k: https://revistas-filologicas.unam.mx/estudios-cultura-maya/index.php/ecm/article/view/526

001.#.#.#: 052.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/526

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: The Postclassic and Colonial texts of the Books of Chilam Balam tell us very little, or so I believe, about the Classic Maya directly. And that little, though very precious, is confined to brief passages in the first three Chronicles, and may have been reshaped to fit the mythological predilections of a later age. The Chronicles being much the best known passages of the Books to Mayanists (Barrera, 1948; Roys 1935), and the events they chronicle being as much as a millennium removed from the composition of the surviving versions, I shall eschew here any attempt to interpret their direct relevance to Mayan Classic history in detail. While the Books do not give us direct answers to our questions about the Classic Maya, they do raise some interesting questions about Classic Maya culture to which archaeology, art history and epigraphy may eventually supply answers. It is the object of this paper to isolate some of these questions, primarily social, calendrical and literary. The basis of these queries is my recent translations of the Books of Tizimin (Edmonson, n. d. a: completed) and Chumayel (Edmonson, n. d. b: in draft). Largely on internal evidence, I conclude that the extant versions of these two Books date to the period between 1824 and 1837. Even if, as I believe, they contain passages transcribed from pre-Conquest glyphic texts, they are nonetheless separated from the end of the Classic period by nearly a thousand years. They present corresponding problems of interpretation before we use them in the reconstruction of earlier Mayan history.

773.1.#.t: Estudios de Cultura Maya; Vol. 12 (1979)

773.1.#.o: https://revistas-filologicas.unam.mx/estudios-cultura-maya/index.php/ecm/index

022.#.#.a: ISSN impreso: 0185-2574; ISSN electrónico:2448-5179

310.#.#.a: Semestral

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.ecm.1979.12.526

harvesting_date: 2023-08-23 17:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

245.1.0.b: Some Postclassic Questions About the Classic Maya

last_modified: 2023-08-23 17:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc

_deleted_conflicts: 2-8d954c7c8a1e460a18c43b899dc60939

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Some Postclassic Questions About the Classic Maya

Edmonson, Munro S.

Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas, UNAM, publicado en Estudios de Cultura Maya, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Edmonson, Munro S. (1979). Some Postclassic Questions About the Classic Maya. Estudios de Cultura Maya; Vol. 12, 1979. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/15671

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Edmonson, Munro S.
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Artes y Humanidades
Título
Some Postclassic Questions About the Classic Maya
Fecha
2013-02-15
Resumen
The Postclassic and Colonial texts of the Books of Chilam Balam tell us very little, or so I believe, about the Classic Maya directly. And that little, though very precious, is confined to brief passages in the first three Chronicles, and may have been reshaped to fit the mythological predilections of a later age. The Chronicles being much the best known passages of the Books to Mayanists (Barrera, 1948; Roys 1935), and the events they chronicle being as much as a millennium removed from the composition of the surviving versions, I shall eschew here any attempt to interpret their direct relevance to Mayan Classic history in detail. While the Books do not give us direct answers to our questions about the Classic Maya, they do raise some interesting questions about Classic Maya culture to which archaeology, art history and epigraphy may eventually supply answers. It is the object of this paper to isolate some of these questions, primarily social, calendrical and literary. The basis of these queries is my recent translations of the Books of Tizimin (Edmonson, n. d. a: completed) and Chumayel (Edmonson, n. d. b: in draft). Largely on internal evidence, I conclude that the extant versions of these two Books date to the period between 1824 and 1837. Even if, as I believe, they contain passages transcribed from pre-Conquest glyphic texts, they are nonetheless separated from the end of the Classic period by nearly a thousand years. They present corresponding problems of interpretation before we use them in the reconstruction of earlier Mayan history.
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN impreso: 0185-2574; ISSN electrónico:2448-5179

Enlaces