dor_id: 59167

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la "Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Medigraphic

561.#.#.u: http://www.odonto.unam.mx/

561.#.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo Técnico-Profesional

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmo

351.#.#.b: Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmo/article/view/54114/48157

100.1.#.a: López Martínez, Yolanda

524.#.#.a: López Martínez, Yolanda (2013). Usefulness of tridimensional cephalometry in diagnosis and surgical treatment planning when compared to bidimensional cephalometry in patients with craniofacial anomalies. Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia; Vol. 1 Núm. 1, 2013. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/59167

245.1.0.a: Usefulness of tridimensional cephalometry in diagnosis and surgical treatment planning when compared to bidimensional cephalometry in patients with craniofacial anomalies

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2013

264.#.1.c: 2013-01-29

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico revistamexicanadeortodoncia@gmail.com

884.#.#.k: https://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmo/article/view/54114

001.#.#.#: 120.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/54114

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: The aim of this study was to compare cephalometric results of three and two dimensional surgical predictions in patients that underwent orthognatic surgery. The study involved two groups of 15 to 30 years old patients with craniofacial anomalies. The fi rst group of patients had orthognatic surgery from April 2004 to January 2005. Pre and post-surgical lateral cephalometric measurements were done using Simplant program, (version CMF 8.2 of Materialise, NV, Belgium). The second group of patients had orthognatic surgery from January 1999 to January 2004. Pre and post-surgical lateral cephalometric measurements were done manually. The results of this study showed a more accurate surgical prediction with the Simplant program. In group I (three-dimensional cephalometric measurement) there was not a statistically significant difference between the prediction measurements done before the surgery and those compared with the post-surgically result. In group II, (two-dimensional cephalometric measurements) on the surgical predictions done previously by hand using cut and paste mobiles taken from the patient’s Hospital records, we observed that in the SNA angle and the maxillary length measurements there was a statistically difference (p < .05). Therefore we conclude that the three-dimensional method is more accurate than the twodimensional method in planning surgical orthognatic procedures.Key words: Three-dimensional cephalometry, bi-dimensional cephalometry, craniofacial anomalies, cleft lip and palate, maxillary protrusion, mandibular pragmatism, orthognatic surgery.

773.1.#.t: Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2013)

773.1.#.o: https://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmo

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 2395-9215

310.#.#.a: Trimestral

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2395-9215(16)30116-7

handle: 33a5cb60811f8a2d

harvesting_date: 2023-06-20 16:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

last_modified: 2023-06-20 16:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

_deleted_conflicts: 2-7f287cfe083935b8c5b9b7134fae278f

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Usefulness of tridimensional cephalometry in diagnosis and surgical treatment planning when compared to bidimensional cephalometry in patients with craniofacial anomalies

López Martínez, Yolanda

Facultad de Odontología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

López Martínez, Yolanda (2013). Usefulness of tridimensional cephalometry in diagnosis and surgical treatment planning when compared to bidimensional cephalometry in patients with craniofacial anomalies. Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia; Vol. 1 Núm. 1, 2013. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/59167

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
López Martínez, Yolanda
Tipo
Artículo Técnico-Profesional
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
Usefulness of tridimensional cephalometry in diagnosis and surgical treatment planning when compared to bidimensional cephalometry in patients with craniofacial anomalies
Fecha
2013-01-29
Resumen
The aim of this study was to compare cephalometric results of three and two dimensional surgical predictions in patients that underwent orthognatic surgery. The study involved two groups of 15 to 30 years old patients with craniofacial anomalies. The fi rst group of patients had orthognatic surgery from April 2004 to January 2005. Pre and post-surgical lateral cephalometric measurements were done using Simplant program, (version CMF 8.2 of Materialise, NV, Belgium). The second group of patients had orthognatic surgery from January 1999 to January 2004. Pre and post-surgical lateral cephalometric measurements were done manually. The results of this study showed a more accurate surgical prediction with the Simplant program. In group I (three-dimensional cephalometric measurement) there was not a statistically significant difference between the prediction measurements done before the surgery and those compared with the post-surgically result. In group II, (two-dimensional cephalometric measurements) on the surgical predictions done previously by hand using cut and paste mobiles taken from the patient’s Hospital records, we observed that in the SNA angle and the maxillary length measurements there was a statistically difference (p < .05). Therefore we conclude that the three-dimensional method is more accurate than the twodimensional method in planning surgical orthognatic procedures.Key words: Three-dimensional cephalometry, bi-dimensional cephalometry, craniofacial anomalies, cleft lip and palate, maxillary protrusion, mandibular pragmatism, orthognatic surgery.
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN: 2395-9215

Enlaces